Addressing the Dangers of Restraint and Seclusion in U.S. Schools

January 17, 2025

The alarming frequency and severe potential consequences of restraint and seclusion practices in U.S. schools have prompted significant concern and action from the U.S. Education Department. These controversial practices, which involve the physical restraint or seclusion of students in response to behavioral issues, have been shown to lead to severe physical injury, emotional trauma, and even death in extreme cases. As a result, the call for change is being led by U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, who is advocating for the adoption of proactive and positive behavior support alternatives to safeguard the well-being of all students.

Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Student Groups

Statistics and Disparities

The use of restraint and seclusion does not affect all students equally but disproportionately targets specific groups. Black students, boys, students of two or more races, and students with disabilities are significantly more likely to be subjected to these harmful practices. For instance, despite students with disabilities constituting only 14% of the total K-12 enrollment during the 2020-21 school year, they accounted for an astounding 81% of physical restraints and 75% of seclusions. Such disparities are not new, reflecting a persistent and long-standing issue that demands immediate attention and action to foster equity within the education system.

These alarming statistics underscore the need for systemic change in how schools approach behavioral issues, emphasizing the importance of individualized and compassionate interventions. Factors contributing to this disproportionality include systemic bias, lack of training for educators on alternative disciplinary methods, and inadequate support for students’ social, emotional, and mental health needs. Addressing these underlying causes is essential to mitigate the adverse impact of restraint and seclusion on vulnerable student groups and to promote a safe and inclusive learning environment for all students.

Historical Context and Current Data

Historically, the use of restraint and seclusion in schools has been a contentious issue, with data showing a persistent pattern of disproportionately affecting minority and disabled students. According to the latest federal data, approximately 52,800 students were subjected to physical restraint, mechanical restraint, or seclusion during the 2020-21 school year. This represents a significant decrease from the 101,990 students reported in the 2017-18 school year. However, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) cautions against making direct comparisons due to the widespread school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The historical context and current data highlight the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to reduce reliance on such practices. Several states have already taken steps to limit the use of restraint and seclusion, and various school districts have revised their policies to ensure these methods are only used in emergencies. These localized efforts, while commendable, underscore the need for a unified and robust federal approach to eliminate harmful practices across all educational institutions and establish consistent standards for protecting all students’ rights and well-being.

Legal and Policy Implications

State-Level Actions and Federal Gaps

In response to growing concerns about the dangers of restraint and seclusion, several states have implemented policies aimed at limiting their use in schools. These state-level actions often include strict regulations on when and how restraint and seclusion can be employed, mandatory reporting requirements, and increased accountability for schools. Despite these efforts, there remains a notable absence of comprehensive federal law explicitly prohibiting these practices, leading to disparities in policy implementation and enforcement across the country.

The lack of a uniform federal standard presents significant challenges for ensuring consistent protection of students’ rights nationwide. While some advocates call for outright bans on restraint and seclusion, others argue for a more nuanced approach that prioritizes student and staff safety during crisis situations. This ongoing debate underscores the complex nature of balancing the need for maintaining discipline and safety in schools with the imperative to protect students from potentially harmful practices. Policymakers must navigate these complexities to develop effective, evidence-based policies that prioritize the well-being of all students.

Secretary Cardona’s Guidance

U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has issued critical guidance to K-12 and early education leaders, urging them to adopt proactive and positive behavior support alternatives instead of relying on restraint and seclusion. Cardona’s guidance emphasizes the importance of addressing students’ social, emotional, physical, and mental health needs through multi-tiered systems of support. These systems aim to provide individualized interventions based on students’ specific needs, promoting programs that foster inclusion, safety, and a sense of belonging within schools.

Cardona’s approach advocates for equipping educators with positive, proactive, and evidence-based tools to meet all students’ needs effectively. By shifting the focus from punitive measures to supportive interventions, schools can create a safer and more nurturing environment that encourages positive behavior and reduces the likelihood of crises. This paradigm shift is long overdue, and its successful implementation requires a commitment to ongoing professional development for educators, access to comprehensive resources, and a collaborative effort between schools, families, and communities.

The Path Forward

Emphasizing Compassionate Alternatives

The harmful effects of restraint and seclusion underscore the urgent need for systemic change in addressing behavioral issues in schools. Implementing compassionate and effective alternatives is essential to ensuring equitable treatment for all students. Multi-tiered systems of support, as advocated by Secretary Cardona, provide a framework for identifying and addressing the underlying causes of behavioral issues through individualized, evidence-based interventions. These approaches not only promote students’ overall well-being but also enhance the learning environment by reducing the need for extreme disciplinary measures.

The shift towards compassionate alternatives also necessitates a reevaluation of existing disciplinary policies and practices. Schools must prioritize preventive measures, early intervention, and positive reinforcement strategies that address students’ unique needs and circumstances. Additionally, fostering a culture of empathy, respect, and understanding within educational institutions is crucial for mitigating conflicts and promoting positive behavior. By embracing these principles, schools can move away from harmful and punitive practices toward a more inclusive and supportive approach to student discipline.

Collaborative Efforts and Continued Advocacy

The success of these initiatives depends on collaboration among educators, policymakers, families, and communities. Continuing to advocate for the elimination of harmful practices and the implementation of supportive policies is crucial. With Secretary Cardona’s leadership and a unified effort, schools can transition to compassionate disciplinary measures that safeguard the well-being of all students, ensuring a healthier, more equitable learning environment for future generations.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later